Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hker 2529 days ago
> Patriotism and nationalism are strong in China and this is not because of the government. In fact the government is an expression of this, not the cause.

> China was attacked, invaded, humiliated from the end of the 18th century until 1945. This is what created a reaction that led to the collapse of imperial rule and to the rise of the modern parties (Nationalists and Communists).

For a discussion of the birth of nationalism and patriotism in China, see this Chinese article [1] by Wai Kin Chung 鍾偉健.

Like anything in social science, nationalism–including the Chinese one–is a social construct. The nationalism of China, in particular the term 中華民族 Zhonghua minzu, was first coined towards the end of the 19th century [1], and before that China was much more receptive of people of different ethnicity: in the past dynasties many famous poets and generals were of a different race. More precisely, Chinese back then didn‘t care much about differing ethnicities, but they care about differing cultures. The Chinese nationalism (esp. stressing the humiliation by foreigners) was socially constructed near the end of the last dynasty (Qing) in China, and clearly played an important role to its demise, in the way you pointed out.

For comparison, Japan or Germany do not stress their defeat and humiliation by the Allied power for their nationalism, because their source of legitimacy is democracy.

[1]: https://gushi.tw/you-are-also-chinese/

> (Nationalism) This is a real source of legitimacy.

Exactly, completely agree.

Xi, like his predecessors, is trying to equate the party with the nation (mostly the Han race) to fuel this modern Chinese nationalism for legitimacy, and the latest attempt is a revival nationalism called Chinese dream [2]. In the last decade, a main source of legitimacy for CCP was fast GDP growth, but this source is drying up quickly due to excess production, unsustainable credit expansion, and aging population. So Xi is trying to promote another source of legitimacy for CCP in case the economy is not performing well, again stressing 中華民族 Zhonghua minzu or effectively the Han race and their humiliation by foreigners, as you elaborated.

[2]: https://www.eurasiareview.com/08122018-the-contours-of-xis-c...

2 comments

after 1976, china lost its legitimacy and began to rely on nationalism to get support
Sounds like pretty much the exact same story every idiot communist government the world has ever seen has spun to get and keep their power. And the idiot masses keep falling for it in China and elsewhere. It seems it's an easy story to pander to the unthinking masses regardless of culture. Almost a universal one. How basic is human nature and the stupidity of the masses never ceases to amaze.