[stcredzero]

This makes it sound like it's quite common to use docker containers operating in a heavily stateful fashion. Is that indeed common nowadays? (Though, the state in this case is only counted on to persist in the named volumes.)

[sz4kerto]

That's completely fine given that the important state is on volumes (named, persistent, bind mounted, whatever).

[johnchristopher]

Well, you are supposed to be able to delete all your volumes, containers and networks and then regenerate it by running the recettes (edit:I mean.. recipes :D) (Dockerfile, docker-compose, kubernetes, volume backup, etc.).

[stcredzero]

Well, you are supposed to be able to delete all your volumes, containers and networks and then regenerate

So then Docker is designed to treat all of those as disposable.

I just searched "recette" and only came up with French cooking references.

[johnchristopher]

> So then Docker is designed to treat all of those as disposable.

I don't really know if it's designed like that but I treat them as disposable and unreliable so I must have a way to resuscitate the thing when something bad happens.

[ashtonbaker]

> I just searched "recette" and only came up with French cooking references.

Perhaps a phonetic spelling of "resets" by a French person :)

[johnchristopher]

Something like that :D. I was thinking "recette" as in "recipe" but somehow only the word "receipt" came to my mind so I thought "oh, it must be one of those words that are the same in both language".

I am a bit tired.

[dunham]

It's french for "recipe".