Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by billabul 2531 days ago
sorry but, isn't that a (unnecessarily complex) cookie?
3 comments

Look, entire industries exist for being complaint with the letter but not the spirit of the law so I'm sure that this in no way meets the definition of a cookie as far as the GPDR is concerned.

However, this is absolutely a cookie. Scraping just enough information from the browser to create a unique but stable hash and then having the browser compute it every request isn't at all different from that browser information acting as the cookie.

Technically no - cookies are stored by the user. If anything it is technically worse in some ways because it moves it to the back end outside of user control.
We don't store a cookie but, yes, the hash doesn't need the date item in it since it has the salt. We'll change that in the next release