|
|
|
|
|
by riffraff
2524 days ago
|
|
> Why would HK gain 'independence? because if they don't they will be slowly assimilated into a non-democratic PRC. I am not calling for independence, I'm saying it would be nice if they had it rather than add 7m people to a regime. > Why would a foreign power 'protect' HK? they wouldn't, that's the point. If HK were to declare independence, in other ages there might have been foreign powers propping them up _for their own interests_.
I am not advocating this, I'm just pointing out this seems unlikely in the current world. As for the Seattle independence: well, HK was independent for a while, and they hare already a SAR, the simile seems incorrect, but sure, it's not trivial to secede. |
|
What you are suggesting is exactly the same as discussing Seattle independence mentioned by GP, and should be regarded as equally extravagant.
> HK was independent for a while
HK was never, ever been independent.