|
|
|
|
|
|
by GuiA
2527 days ago
|
|
|
> literally famous for being famous [...] not battle tested > “[no other] viable high performance language with the same ecosystem, support and tooling” This comment strikes me as deeply contradictory. I have qualms with C++ as any other C++ programmer, but saying it’s famous for being famous is just ridiculous. C++ has been used to operate nuclear submarines, airplanes, pacemakers, financial systems, ... over the last few decades. I’d like to know what you consider “battle tested”. |
|
|