[RepAgent]

>You just literally recommended it for an item of tangible personal property,

Yes. We all write somewhat inaccurately and carelessly in discussion groups. Instead of nitpicking each other, we should try to read each other favorably.

What I mean is that there is classes of tangibles from pots and pans that one commentators was worried about into paintings worth of millions. It's concealable that at some valuations artifacts worth of millions are considered different asset classes.

[dragonwriter]

It seems to me that if you want to recommend this to be applied to some particular subset of tangible real property rather than the whole class, than rather than mocking the idea that your recommendation would extend to the existing category as a whole, you ought to actually define the subset to which you would propose applying it so that your actual proposal can be evaluated.