Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tptacek 2531 days ago
I'm confused, because:

1. The story seems to acknowledge that there was adult content on the site.

2. There is adult content evident in the Archive.org snapshots of the site.

3. Some of that content appears to be promoted content, links from the front page appear to go to content tagged "xxx", and many of the categories in the directory are also tagged with things like "sexy" and "girls".

4. It's not at all clear what the distinction you're trying to draw between UGC video and... what other kind of video is there on the site? Why is there a family filter at all if there's no adult content on the site?