Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Traster 2526 days ago
If it were strategically important for the company the company should have bought the properties. It's a direct conflict of interest - and one that has been serious enough that they've ended up having to build an entire corporate strategy to deal with. Also, this is not the only conflict of interest: WeWork bought part of an artificial surfing wave pool in 2016 and the only reason anyone can find to do that is the CEO likes surfing.
1 comments

If this is true then I’m increasingly surprised at how bad VC returns must be for them to think this is a good investment.
It's perhaps the other way around. VC returns are so good that they can make lots of mistakes.