[stillworks]

Granted the article is a bit of a "Decaf-Soy-Latte", but in my experience, whatever that can be monitored should be monitored.

Software deliveries/releases can often realistically be non-perfect. (Don't have direct experience with Canary releases TBH though)

In case anything goes wrong any objective evidence which helps to reconstruct the failure scenario is valuable.

Also... Murphy's Law.

>If you've designed software where the whole service can degrade based on the CPU consumption of a single machine.

Typically, if such software is indeed released, I think it will be several CPUs on several hosts.