|
|
|
|
|
by KingPrad
2532 days ago
|
|
This type of "low tech" idea seems like the kind of thing Google, Yelp, and all the other big companies should be doing a better job with. I have celiac and presumably Google has figured that out by now (or could, if they spent some time determining allergies for accounts). Yet in Google Maps I have to type "restaurant gluten free" when looking for food options. Then I have to poke around to see which might be legitimately gluten free. I've been typing this in for a decade, and never has Maps learned this basic time-saving assumption it should make. Same with Yelp. It hasn't figured out that I always filter by gluten free and search reviews for that. It never just makes gluten free restaurants prominent, nor follows up with me the next day on whether it made me ill or things like that. As you say, it's baffling the simple filtering that could be done based on known user information. Note that my story is about gluten free, but would apply to any number of food allergies or dietary preferences, yet the "market leaders" seem unable to innovate on this specificity. |
|
Here's an example of what I hate about Google. I searched for recipes "without eggs". It gave me hundreds and hundreds of hits for "without eggs or butter". Now that may be what most people want, sure, but it's eradicated the possibility of other permutations. When you guess what people want to search for, you remove the ability to search for nearly every other possibility imaginable.
It makes me feel like Skynet has already won.