[EmpirePhoenix]

Sure, depends only on your ethic. E.G (note devils advocate) A utilitarist might argue, that killing of a larger amount of humans that are not worth it might be for the greater good of all

A extremist fascist even has a pretty clear definition of worth added to that

Asimovs concept of being killed instead of retirement

Various concepts in fiction of adding globally some additions to drinking water to lower fertility on global scale

Chinas politic of one child per family was even somewhat fair as it discriminates equally

[C1sc0cat]

You mean the Sixty in time enough for love - don't think he was propsing it as a good thing