|
|
|
|
|
by ralfn
2542 days ago
|
|
So this outrage is in the Netherlands. Security cameras may not be pointed by businesses at public space (which we have a lot of unlike the US). The local government itself may place cameras though but private parties, what kind of nightmare situation is that? And in public or private space when there are cameras there needs to be signs everywhere to warn and inform you. So in the Netherlands at least.. Google recording a conversation with someone who doesn't know Google is recording is definitely illegal. The question is: will they prosecute? Then it becomes a geopolitical question because we are a small country with a disproportionate number of Google datacenters. So to summarize: - This is definitely illegal in the Netherlands - There is no consent of others participating and you really do need that - Fine print is not consent: consent of terms and conditions requires a majority (determined by polling or common sense of a judge) of users to be aware and knowledgeable what they consented to. - there won't be prosecution by the Dutch public prosecutor. - there will be a lobby for the EU to buttrape Google but it may use different reasons or context |
|