[koolba]

The reason is when you have some other crypto holding and you want to close out your position but not have any reportable tax or legal liability.

Of course you’re trading one set of liabilities and legal ramifications for a whole new set. Plus a hell of a lot of counter party risk.

[SimonPStevens]

So to clarify... If you were holding bitcoin, but decided you wanted out because you think it's about to go down, you'd exchange for tether and hold that instead until you decided that bitcoin is ready to start going back up again.

And you accept all the associated risk rather than fully cashing out to real dollars because your jurisdiction doesn't treat crypto to crypto purchase as a taxable event?

Interesting. Thank you.

[carbocation]

But if your jurisdiction is NY (as it is for OP), then this doesn't really answer your question IMHO.

[trixie_]

On a crypto only exchange, if you want to have some of your holdings fixed to the dollar then you hold it as tether. Usually because you are getting out of crypto or waiting to get in. Taxable events are on you to report and pay regardless.

[xur17]

> The reason is when you have some other crypto holding and you want to close out your position but not have any reportable tax or legal liability.

In the US trading crypto to crypto has tax liabilities.

[Alex3917]

> In the US trading crypto to crypto has tax liabilities.

Or, more accurately, just because you record the ownership of an asset on a blockchain doesn't mean you're allowed to violate the law.

[SimonPStevens]

I believe it's not as clear cut as that. I believe that in many jurisdictions there are various rules that allow trading within certain assets classes to not be treated as a taxable event for capital gains purposes unless you trade outside the class back to a regular currency. The taxable event can occur only when you realise the profit or loss.

Whether this is the case with crypto currencies is all dependent on how your particular jurisdiction has chosen to classify crypto. Or often just your best guess if your particular jurisdiction hasn't been clear on the classification as many haven't.

[arcticbull]

Nope, it is that clear cut. Some coiners tried to convince the SEC crypto-to-crypto exchanges were like kind 1031 exchanges and the SEC had none of it. If you've been under the impression it was not a taxable event, you should solicit a very competent tax attorney to get you out of whatever hole you're looking up from the bottom of.

[jki275]

It's never been that way in the US. Sale of any cryptocurrency for any other or any asset or even a cup of coffee has been a taxable event since the beginning.

You realize a profit or loss every time you transact, and that's a taxable event. It's not tied to whether or not the transaction is into or out of fiat currency.

[tehlike]

For us, it is a taxable event, it is pretty clear.

[giaour]

Receiving the proceeds of the sale of one crypto currency in another crypto currency doesn't magically wipe out your tax liability. Your capital gains are still taxable, just as they would be if you bartered stocks without first selling your holdings.

[koolba]

Oh for sure. I didn't mean to imply it was a good idea. For anybody in the USA this is not going to be a legal winner as any transformation from crypto A to crypto B is going to be a taxable event.

I bet there's still plenty of people using this for tax purposes, either misguidingly for tax avoidance or explicitly for tax evasion.