Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by somacert 2533 days ago
The "Does not resume interrupted operations" gripe confuses me because that is the main reason I reach for rsync, I have a large tree of files I need to be somewhere else and if the transfer fails I would like it to not transfer files already transferred.

So I use rsync, which offers, as a core feature, resuming interrupted operation.

1 comments

That one is badly phrased, it's about resuming a single interrupted large file. By default rsync will create a new temp file and start over, but there are options to make it resumable.