[RankingMember]

The point remains that crime/radicalization can occur over any site/medium. Banning a site or medium seems heavy-handed unless it exists expressly to facilitate crime/radicalization, in my opinion. TOR, for example, has been a known avenue for the spread of child pornography, yet we don't shut it down.

[hi5eyes]

there's more CP on twitter than TOR but nice meme

edit: nice meme bc who actually uses TOR? theres so much more cp on surface web liek chans, tumblr used to be a pedos dream, twitter etc.

no one uses tor zzz

[RankingMember]

Got any proof to back up that statement? There have been numerous FBI busts of Onion sites. For example: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/fbi-operated-23-...

[hi5eyes]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/13/twitte...

https://sputniknews.com/science/201905091074866833-Twitter-3...

you can literally google twitter child porn

theres hundreds of threads exposing how these people start group dms baiting kids

https://twitter.com/xcutesannex/status/1147456947727282177 shit in a similar format to this

[RankingMember]

This is a weird quibble. Is your argument simply to let me know I could've used an example with more child porn? Unless you're arguing there's no CP on TOR, my point in the context of the original comment stands.