Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by panarky 2542 days ago
> HN is anti-hype

This is part of it, but that's faulty reasoning. Just because there's a lot of hype and fraud surrounding the technology and network does not mean that the technology and network is hype or fraud.

Another factor is that we're very talented at finding all the reasons something new won't work, and not so good at understanding how something flawed can still be useful.

Exhibit A is the infamous Dropbox comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224

But fundamentally, most of us, like most people generally, fail to understand what money is. We use it every day, so we all think we understand it. Money seems tangible and valuable, but it's all just a very powerful social construct that's backed by nothing more than collective belief and utility.

The mind rebels at such a flimsy foundation, so many of the criticisms aimed at cryptocurrency are equally valid when aimed at dollars or yen.

Maybe we're doomed to an Eternal September of repeating the same arguments in an endless loop for decades more. Please, let's hear the story of Dutch tulips again, or how dollars are actually backed by taxes or the military or buying cups of coffee.

If we listened to the nattering nabobs of negativism, we'd never invent anything truly novel.

1 comments

I never suggested that Bitcoin or Blockchain were entirely hype. I'm suggesting that many uses of them, and many articles about them, are, and HN treats them accordingly. I'm talking about the 23rd article on "let's do medical records but On The Blockchain, which will solve every problem with medical records". I'm talking about people who seriously suggest that Bitcoin will make existing currency and governments obsolete. I'm talking about comments that decry the slightest criticism or moderation as "the nattering nabobs of negativism".