|
|
|
|
|
|
by nobodyandproud
2543 days ago
|
|
|
I don’t see how the FAAs assessment that the 737 MAX was easier to put into a stall for greater that 12 degrees AoA is the same as a “reversal of controls” or a “sudden or excessive reduction of elevator control” stipulated in 25.253 What am I missing? I am not an aviation expert in any sense. |
|
|
§25.175 Demonstration of static longitudinal stability.
Static longitudinal stability must be shown as follows:
(a) Climb. The stick force curve must have a stable slope at speeds between 85 and 115 percent of the speed at which the airplane—
(1) Is trimmed, with—
(i) Wing flaps retracted;
(ii) Landing gear retracted;
(iii) Maximum takeoff weight; and
(iv) 75 percent of maximum continuous power for reciprocating engines or the maximum power or thrust selected by the applicant as an operating limitation for use during climb for turbine engines; and
(2) Is trimmed at the speed for best rate-of-climb except that the speed need not be less than 1.3 VSR
These are transports, not fighters. The basic idea is that you want it to be harder work to make a sharper maneuver, and want the aircraft to naturally level out. If the force required decreases for a steeper pitch/roll/yaw, then the plane will naturally want to intensify the maneuver. It's like a car with oversteer--let go of the steering wheel and it will make a sharper turn. As the article cited said, the FAA and Boeing's test pilots weren't happy with the yoke forces in certain situations.