My guess is that the average supernode is on something like 6M/1.5M DSL. This is easy to simulate.
Now, if most of your nodes are on machines directly connected to 10GbE, then that's a problem. But most Skype nodes aren't. (I do imagine there are a few connected to 100M+ connections. But only a few.)
They could have setup their 'mega-supernodes' running the new client in a production environment, so that if it crashed horribly, it wasn't a client machine that failed (or their entire network).
Upgrading (relatively) untested software network-wide on what is essentially their critical infrastructure is bad news. If this didn't happen now, it would happen sometime. It was just a question of when.
Now, if most of your nodes are on machines directly connected to 10GbE, then that's a problem. But most Skype nodes aren't. (I do imagine there are a few connected to 100M+ connections. But only a few.)