[mraison]

From a non-US point of view, it is indeed a very surprising aspect of the US legal system.

Making jail time linear seems like a strange fit for finite human lives. Are there many other legal systems in the world that work like this ?

[nikonyrh]

Well in Finland you get a discount if you have committed crimes before.

There are cases when a person had raped someone and during a leave from the jail he had raped an other victim. The jail term for the second offence is less than usual due to the first sentence still not being fulfilled.

[jfries]

Aren't these large numbers just the sum of the maximum jail time for each of the charges? How are multiple charges handled in other countries?

[anticensor]

Yes, in the US and most of continental Europe, multiple charges are usually first summed, then sentence determination is done by court order and then penal enforcement rules kick in after the verdict (2 years sentenced does not always mean 2 years served). A 1000 years' sentence has a greater non-parole duration than a life with parole; it is likely that he will serve life with no parole. IANAL, though.

[mraison]

At least in France, this article says that for similar concurrent charges (not sure how similarity is determined), the most important sentence is picked. So, max instead of sum.

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticl...

[marcusverus]

This seems odd, like buy one get one one free, but for crimes. If you murder a guy in France, you can burn his house down without additional penalty?

[nikonyrh]

I am quite certain you can.

[anticensor]

That means if a particular action is a crime under multiple articles, the most serious one is chosen. Separately committed crimes are different.