I'm not going to speak for him, but I sense that he does "believe" in natural monopolies. He also probably feels like there's nothing /wrong/ with natural monopolies, and I'd have to agree.
A natural monopoly can and ought to be defined as an entity with monopolistic market share achieved WITHOUT government regulation, subsidies, and the like, AND WITHOUT the illegal use of physical violence.
A natural monopoly can and ought to be defined as an entity with monopolistic market share achieved WITHOUT government regulation, subsidies, and the like, AND WITHOUT the illegal use of physical violence.