[sanswork]

If you don't know the basic features of a language you don't know that language anymore. You maybe once knew it really well, and you still know the general syntax, but you aren't a insert language programmer anymore.

I do agree though that testing specific language skills is mostly pointless. The only time I've been given a programming test as part of an interview I was given a basic language spec that filled a couple pages then a book of problems to solve in the new language. Thats the way you should test programming skill in my opinion.

[TFrancis]

I don't think that I would ever hire a insert language programmer. When looking for someone to program, I'm just looking for a programmer; language isn't important.

[sanswork]

A lot of people get hired in for emergencies. In such cases waiting for person to learn your offices language of choice isn't ideal.

[TFrancis]

Though they aren't always possible to avoid, I consider "emergencies" examples of poor business decisions and try to avoid them.

[Xichekolas]

While I can see some merit in this argument, I'd also point out that I've never met a decent programmer that can't pick up a new language at least passingly in a day or two.