Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by BorRagnarok 2539 days ago
Not coincidentally the bottom six positions on that list are also the countries the US and NATO decided to invade during the previous two decades.

Can't have those people you want to kill leaving the country now can you?

2 comments

Not so much about leaving the country, as about knowing who from there is in your country. Most of the point of requiring a visa for entry (at this point in globalization when very few countries are ever actively at war) isn’t stopping people from entering, but rather knowing exactly who’s entering, and then being able to track them from the time they enter until the time they leave, if you feel the need to.

As well, when you don’t trust a foreign government to ensure that people only get passports for their own identity, you can’t be sure that a random person coming in with a passport from said country isn’t actually a Person of Interest. So, you require they fill out a passport-like form in your own country, and then try as best as you can to figure out if they are who their passport says they are. That’s a visa.

Pakistan is down there with them. I don't know how much higher Iraq and Afghanistan would be up the list had the US never invaded.

I also doubt Syria would be much further up the list had the US never set foot there.

Not supporting the US position, but those areas had passport and visa issues well before any US involvement.