|
|
|
|
|
by dymk
2546 days ago
|
|
Maybe a spike takes a week. Maybe a spike takes an hour. I can't estimate that. Which would be fine, but then management or the PM expects me to loop back around when a spike is complete. I'd rather just continue engineering a solution when I'm done investigating, which is the natural progression of things. I'd rather treat {get requirements, investigate, implement, debug, deploy} as a single atomic task, rather than splitting it across N meetings for planning the sprint, planning the spike, meeting with the PM for more requirements they forgot to put in the user story, describing it at a retrospective, showing it at a demo. Now I know somebody will say "But that's now how agile works!". Well, we have a few agile "coaches" that were embedded in our teams who would disagree. |
|