Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nmc 2545 days ago
TL;DR

After being jettisoned, the Service Module remained dangerously close to the Command Module during re-entry, so there was a risk that the two could have collided

2 comments

That was a stupidly long article, repeating things a lot of people already knew, for that little bit of information...
It’s written in the modern clickbait style- they tell you that you’ll never believe something, then they string you along as long as they can. It’s frustrating to read and usually ends up being mundane info. Usually by the second paragraph you can spot this type of writing and need to be ready for disappointment.

I’m not sure that the whole command/service module separation issue was actually classified, or if it is just a less commonly known part of the story.

Its saving grace, IMHO, is that it has a link to the NASA report on the issue: https://archive.org/details/nasa_techdoc_19710017109/page/n3
Apollo 11 Mission Anomaly Report 3 - Service Module Entry

Conclusion

Tip-off moments applied to the service module at jettison cause the spin vector to be misaligned with the service module X-axis. The rigid body spin motion of the service module excites longitudinal slosh of the propellants in tanks. The sloshing then becomes the dominant force and causes the spin vector to approach a position normal to the service module X-axis. The sloshing can orient the service module spin axis such that the net -X thrusting over a period of 300 seconds can not only reduce the separation velocity of the service module but also reverse its direction. This condition introduces a remote possibility of recontact between the service modules and command module. An optimum separation velocity can be obtained for a range of propellant loads by restricting the spin thrusting to 2 seconds and the X-axis thrusting to 25 seconds of firing time.

I love how the solution was to add one time-delay relay into the circuit. It's a 70s version of a one-line patch.
I don't know who said it first, but we see a lot of blog posts that could have been condensed into tweets, and a lot of books could be condensed into a blog posts.
What makes it the more significant is that they launched 12 with no fix in place.

It doesn't reveal how they kept the astronauts' comments looking out the window secret. Weren't they broadcast live?

It seems like the fact of the SM and its fragments not falling behind must mean something important about hypersonic flight.

> Weren't they broadcast live?

Nope. Communications were split into multiple channels, all of which were monitored at the PAO, or Public Affairs Office console in mission control by a NASA official. It was deliberately designed so that the public only heard what NASA wanted them to hear.

> It doesn't reveal how they kept the astronauts' comments looking out the window secret. Weren't they broadcast live?

The plasma buildup around the vehicle interferes with radio communication -- though I'm not sure in exactly which phases of the reentry.

Or maybe the window orientation made that hard to see?