|
|
|
|
|
by phicoh
2552 days ago
|
|
SHA-2 was on related shaky ground. Remember that in relatively short significant advances were made in breaking MD-5 and SHA-1. SHA-2 is based on similar constructs as MD-5/SHA-1. For this reason the SHA-3 competition was started to find a new hash function based on different principles. In the end it was found that creating practical attacks for SHA-2 is too hard. But we don't know what the future will bring. The difference between RSA and SHA-2 is that RSA is a very nice mathematical structure and we are still learning a lot about (prime) numbers. In contrast, SHA-2 is weird structure that has to solve a hard problem. It is hard to attack. |
|