Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by paulryanrogers 2551 days ago
How common is this?

At the smaller companies I've worked for the only filtering was of the big, distracting sites like Facebook.

3 comments

At one of the large companies I've worked before, the corporate filter barred access to https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html because it was a hacking website. Which it cleverly determined, you've guessed it, by checking the URL and seeing it had "hack" in there. Everything with "hack" in the URL was banned.

Pretty sure all those JavaScript ninja hackers they'd hired were a little baffled that they hire hackers but don't let them view nasty hacker pages...

I also take it that this company didn't have any offices in essex?
Scunthorpe is a common example for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem
The standard joke is "Scunthorpe, Arsenal, and Manchester fucking United."
I run our corporate proxy and security made the call to block ‘personal’ sites since it was basically the Wild West of content...
I worked a job where the web filter blocked the majority of blogging platforms as "social media."