[educationdata]

> That's not what she said, she said "Trump situation", and by situation, one would assume, the massive abuse of social platforms to spread false and misleading data about Clinton, which we know from scientific studies, that false stories were reshared far more by Trump supporters than vice versa, and that a non-trivial chunk of these fake gifs came from overseas.

1) Can you please cite those "scientific studies"?

2) Even if what you said is true. I am not sure how much it has anything to do with Google. Most of influences happened on Facebook or other social media platforms. How can Google prevent things from happening again on Facebook?

[Fellshard]

That was certainly the most vague and easily re-interpreted statement she made. Hoping for fuller context of the conversation so we can get some better understanding of her intended use.