|
|
|
|
|
by _dczq
2552 days ago
|
|
==The parent was suggesting to regulate first== The assumption is that introducing a bill to regulate dark patterns is the same as "moving fast". This bill hasn't even made it to committee [1] and darkpatterns.org was started in 2010 [2]. I think an argument could be made that the US government is actually moving pretty slowly on this topic. GDPR has been in place for over a year, so there is significant data to understand the implications of this type of regulation. ==and fix broken regulations later.== How is this different from a software product releasing an updated version? Microsoft Excel is on v16 and I don't think anyone is accusing that product of moving fast and breaking things. I wish we spent more time adding features and fixing bugs from past legislation. [1] https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/s1084 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_pattern |
|
As to your second point, I also wish we spent more time adding features and fixing bugs from past legislation. I don't think that happens nearly enough, which is a major reason I don't trust our ability to just fix shoddy regulation after the fact.