|
|
|
|
|
|
by code_duck
5663 days ago
|
|
|
Based on my position, wired is still young with lots of competition going on. You don't fix something that ain't broken. Why should the two be considered differently? And no, I feel consumers can figure out for themselves that paying .25 to send 256 bytes of data is a scam. But I don't think wireless carriers should be granted special abilities to protect this sort of underhanded dealings which wired providers are not. What would you think if it was said that DSL and cable internet providers could block MSN, AIM, Jabber and Skype IMs because they had a special deal where they wanted you to use their IM service for .25 cents a message? Though other data was unlimited? I'd have a problem with that, personally. |
|
|