|
|
|
|
|
|
by yifanlu
2560 days ago
|
|
|
Instead of complaining about the quality of the article, I’m thinking about the open question at the end. What would be a higher level abstraction for FPGA development? Is it possible to create a language around FSMs? Most hardware seems to have two parts: the actual logic that implements some functionality and then some FSM that implements the control logic. The FSM may also have a lot of implicit/assumed states (like a counter for some timeout). Maybe a higher level language can expose these design pattern in a nicer way and hide all the messy low level details (like sequential/combinational logic, connecting ports and wires, matching signal widths, etc). |
|
|