[asdkhadsj]

> But, please stop, Go and Rust can't be compared, they don't have the same goal in mind.

Nonsense. For _certain things_ they can't be compared, but many things they can be. If I can compare Python and Rust, why can't I compare Go and Rust?

For example, I chose Rust at work recently for a project that was previously written in Go. How do you think I made that decision if I can't compare them?

Fundamentally yes, they're different languages. But seeing as Rust is quite usable in many areas it's perfectly valid to compare them. I see this "they can't be compared" so frequently that it's comical to me. Not trying to be insulting here, it's just perplexing.

I think it must stem from back in the day when Go was "incorrectly" labeled as a Systems Language. People ended up thinking that Rust and Go were competing for the same space. That there was bound to be a winner and a loser. They can happily co-exist, they're not at war, but they can and will frequently be compared. They have a ton of overlap.