|
|
|
|
|
by boubiyeah
2556 days ago
|
|
Not sure why Evan is not being more transparent regarding this renaming. It would be easy to just say "yes, I got a bit carried away with the naming and my big future plans, but the community reaction made me realise perhaps it was not a great idea" Insead he's like: "what? it was the plan all along :)" |
|
We're all still learning how to work with the RFC documents. We want them to be an important tool for the community but initially, the response from the community was very low. Paradoxically this whole situation made the wider community aware of those RFC documents so hopefully it will go in a good direction. But that initial low response made us believe "oh we have time to sort out things like the phrasing". Turned out it was wrong.
The advice to change the names came from the community and it was a good one. It got support in the core team internal channels and got implemented.