[DigitalTerminal]

LOL! Trusting NSA for UEFI code is like.... I hope cryptographers and hackers better than what NSA has go through that code with a fine toothed comb.

[ShinTakuya]

The title is pretty shitty but you should at least click through before making a comment.

This is a contribution to Coreboot, which is an alternative to UEFI/BIOS.

As much as I dislike US government agencies in general, I think this time they have good motive to provide good code. Undermining this code would also undermine the systems of other government agencies.

In this case, I trust the NSA more than random contributors on the internet that have less known motives and may in many cases be agents of foreign spy agencies.

[maxheadroom]

>The title is pretty shitty but you should at least click through before making a comment.

Something, something, site guidelines about suggesting the commentor didn't RTFA.

>I trust the NSA more than random contributors on the internet that have less known motives and may in many cases be agents of foreign spy agencies.

To be fair, I think that you stated the OC's point and failed to recognise it:

Your domestic spy agency is another's foregin spy agency. Why should they trust yours over theirs? Both have (presumably) equally less-known motives, yeah?

[cannedslime]

For non-americans, NSA is a "foreign spy agency"...

[p_l]

And "illegal combatant"

[p_l]

Coreboot is NOT an UEFI alternative. Unless you want to regress computing to closed platforms (it can be open source and closed platform).

[floatboth]

Coreboot is what you can run before an UEFI implementation, they aren't mutually exclusive.

[p_l]

My wish is a good open source UEFI implementation running on top of tight coreboot setup, that goes all out on the security features.