|
|
|
|
|
by beaner
2556 days ago
|
|
Definitely true, but also besides the point. The comment in question was suggesting government control/influence, not familial dynastic influence. Also just because much press internationally is political doesn't mean they share the same political perspectives. They are often at odds with each other by region. Further, the type of media controlled this way no longer has a monopoly in information. Thanks to the internet, there are many smaller and diverse organizations with perspectives now as easily accessible. |
|