|
|
|
|
|
by th3l3mons
2558 days ago
|
|
Apple has used US Customs to seize parts intended for repairs, including parts from donor boards. Apple sued (and last I knew was trying to appeal) a Norway repair shop for repairing iPhones using "counterfeit" components. iirc, some parts, including the display, must match appropriately or the OS won't boot as a form of parts validation, effectively preventing display swaps when repairing. I don't think the previous comment was licensing the design. Apple has been very aggressive with donor parts and data recovery. |
|
I’ve seen plenty of articles about parts coming directly from factories, rather than from torn down devices.
What is the actual ratio of stolen vs recovered by non-Apple facilities ?
I’m sure Apple would claim 100% stolen and rtr orgs would say 100% recovered. Note that Apple pays (in the form of a discount) for returned devices so if a refurbisher is selling parts they’ve claimed aren’t recoverable they are selling stolen goods (reason for destroying irrecoverable devices is to reduce/remove incentive for this type of theft)