|
|
|
|
|
by hvidgaard
2561 days ago
|
|
Not the person you're replying to. But how would forceful typing be more energy efficient? You press harder (more muscle activation), keys travel longer (more muscle activation), and you have to move your fingers back "up" again. Btw. the reason pianists want weighted keys is mostly because it mimics acoustic pianos. If you practice on non weighted keys and play on a piano, you would tire your fingers very quickly. Apart from that major reason, the weight gives a tactile feedback when playing that is arguably necessary to play beyond what you learn the first few years. Without it going back and forth between soft and loud requires an entirely different feedback mechanism. But this does not IMO translate to keyboards. You're interested in the tactile feedback of the "click" that signals that the press has been registered. |
|
I can buy the extra energy cost for walking because gravity is putting some force on there and you'd expend energy to counterbalance it versus just letting the ground push back.
But your fingers have exactly as much force as you put behind them yourself, so I don't know what's up with the finger-slammers. They totally exist though.
I was probably reaching with the foot-stompers comparison. Seems like a similar result, but the causes may well be unrelated.