[cd34]

I'm guessing English isn't your primary language. There are numerous typos and grammatical errors throughout the document. Spellcheck would catch about 90% of them as they aren't project names. The grammar errors might be more difficult since you are getting the right wordstem and you're getting words that are close.

It also seems like 2/3 of the way through, you started templating your answers and reviews and didn't do as thorough an analysis of the competitive solutions.

The thesis does demonstrate that you know and understand the technology but I don't get the sense you have an in-depth understanding of what was done. While the results suggest the project was successful, it seems more like you were an observer, validating decisions. It also seems you don't agree the decisions made were the correct ones based on some of the underlying tones.

Still, there is a lot of great information in there, presented very well. You might consider submitting it to highscalability.com.

Would you implement the current structure the same way after writing your thesis?

[rb2k_]

Thank you for the feedback!

Typos: Yeah, I'm German. Could you just point out some of the errors (2-3), that would help me to look for them harder next time :)

Lack of detail towards the end: The thesis was written after most of the project was done and I wanted to give people new to the field an introduction to the tools I used and the problems I encountered. All of this was an actual internship project and the ability to use it as my thesis was just a nice "addon".

That's probably why you (rightfully) noticed that some of the competitive solutions (e.g. graph databases) might have not gotten the level of detail and research they deserved. It was a balance between delivering a working product and putting the thesis on a theoretically sound basis while moving to another country :)

In general, I'd re-implement it more or less the same way. I would probably do one or more of the following things:

- take a look at how Riak search turned out

- switch from MySQL to Postgres

- Think about another way of determining popularity than incoming links (can get problematic when trying to recrawl sites... you'd have to keep track of all of the domains that link to a certain site. Maybe graph databases would be a good solution for this problem)

- start with coding EVERYTHING in an asynchronous manner. Maybe use em-synchrony (https://github.com/igrigorik/em-synchrony)

- write more tests (the more the better)

[cd34]

things I remember: postgressql, defiantly (you meant definitely), you used deduct rather than deduce. Several typos were obvious typos that spellcheck would find. Double keys, letters swapped, etc.

Writing async from the start is worlds easier than refactoring. Had you been there at the start, I'm thinking your thesis may have taken a much different approach. It looks like you understand scalability, but, every day there's a new product to evaluate. :) Good luck with it.