|
|
|
|
|
by rmah
2553 days ago
|
|
The NP did not try to do the right thing. Given the facts outlined in the article, a qualified medical professional would have sent the patient to a hospital (emergency room) regardless of the opinion of the consulting MD's who did not see the patient. Why? Because the NP did see the patient. Why take an off the cuff opinion of a MD who hasn't examined the patient or seen his charts (all info was given verbally over the phone) as absolute? Note, many seem to interpret the refusal of admission as an inability to go to a hospital, that is not the case. The emergency room was still available. IMO, there was failure at all levels. The NP failed, the consulting doctors failed, the hospital chain failed. Systemic failure. |
|
If they are part of the same network the dr probably had access to the charts, and if not I assume nurses who are required to call doctors can communicate the content of a chart.
It also makes no sense to say: NP you are required to contact a doctor to get permission to admit a patient, but if you think the doctor is wrong you should admit them anyway. If that isn’t the rule then you should save money by not having drs who only exist to answer the phone and trust you NPs to admit patients who need it.