[masterfooo]

Thanks for the review. I feel like I gave them too much of a trust :(

Matrix devs, instead of battling the reviewer here, please make a proper blog post and explain what is really going on here. Tell us the truth about your data handling and the data retention.

The reviewer did his own share of work. If there are mistaken parts in his reporting, please correctly explain them in a civilized way in a possible blog post.

thanks

[Arathorn]

apologies if it seems like we’re battling the reviewer; it’s just that there is a bunch of stuff which is simply incorrect, which is frustrating. did you see our pdf response, out of interest?

[masterfooo]

Hi,

Yeah, the issue with all these replies is that the real replies that addresses the issues can be lost. I really recommend that you put that on your official blog so we all can benefit from reading your response.

[Arathorn]

yup, our plan is to fix the valid issues highlighted here and blog a response.

[maxidorius]

Or what about joining the room given on the research paper and actually participating in the discussion? We would love to have some proper interaction where we can exchange network output and screen recordings that simply show first hand what we are talking about...

Replying to a blog to a living research document intended to be used by another project/protocol feels silly. Whatever you write certainly is not all up to date anymore with the corrections we made thanks to the Matrix community that joined the room, and the Grid community that kept on discussion the doc.

Where is Matrix.org tho? This could also be a good occasion for the three new guardians to join the community.