|
|
|
|
|
by daotoad
2557 days ago
|
|
No need to assume malice, other human foibles like attribution bias and hubris nicely explain the horrific idea of calling your language/tool/project 'Observable'. I, for one, am irritated by the name and hope they either change it or that the project fades. Things are confusing enough without this kind of nonsense. Yes, I get that each cell in a spreadsheet is observing its neigbors. Yes, it's nice that you can "observe" your code auto updating. Yes it's nice that people are trying to improve upon spreadsheets as a programming model. Don't be purposely obtuse right out of the gate by naming your project after a widely used pattern, tool or technique. Call it Cells or Panopticon or something. Please. In other news, check out my new web framework, called MVC. |
|
The term “observable” used as a noun in a programming context seems to me very clunky and vague. YMMV.
I am much more familiar with the term “observable” in physics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable