After a lot of heat was applied, Google backed off and acted like the world misunderstood their intent. But they sure tried. Meanwhile, Mozilla increased the default privacy level of Firefox.
Google initially claimed that thus was to remove the need for add blockers to have to see the web request in order to operate.
They proposed an API that was like safari where the block lists are handled by a pattern match inside the browser rather then running a js script.
They made this announcement increasing the number of patterns that can be matched however the API remains the same.
Now it could be that google is trying to undermine add blockers in order cement its power. However this argues agaist it. Since the list is limited and google is the largest provider of adds if there are insufficent patterns then blocking google ads would result in googles rivels not being blocked.
They proposed an API that was like safari where the block lists are handled by a pattern match inside the browser rather then running a js script.
They made this announcement increasing the number of patterns that can be matched however the API remains the same.
Now it could be that google is trying to undermine add blockers in order cement its power. However this argues agaist it. Since the list is limited and google is the largest provider of adds if there are insufficent patterns then blocking google ads would result in googles rivels not being blocked.