|
|
|
|
|
|
by x0ner
2558 days ago
|
|
|
P1) I don't see the current naming model as any worse than the disjointed CVEs of today. P2) What if all wide-impacting vulnerabilities were treated like this, regardless of theory or not; the vulnerability still exists. P3) Names are fairly easy to come up with. Some of my views on why this approach is beneficial, https://medium.com/@9bplus/why-i-love-marketing-vulnerabilit... |
|
|