|
|
|
|
|
by pmontra
2564 days ago
|
|
It could go that way but it's usually the most powerful to have the connections with lawmakers and suggest what to write (or not to write) in some laws. About unintended consequences, check this article about GDPR after one year https://truthonthemarket.com/2019/05/24/gdpr-after-one-year-... I quote a couple of sentences but there is much more there > After the rule took effect in May, Google’s tracking software appeared on slightly more websites, Facebook’s on 7% fewer, while the smallest companies suffered a 32% drop, according to Ghostery, which develops privacy-enhancing web technology. > The fact that Google’s compliance strategy has ended up hurting its competitors and redirecting higher demand back to its own marketplace, where it can guarantee it has user consent, has unsettled publishers and ad tech vendors |
|
I run a small SaaS business, which doesn't do anything ethically questional with user data, and becoming compliant involved:
- writing a document on GDPR compliance
- changing a few settings so IPs aren't logged or are at least anonymised
- verifying log files aren't kept longer than needed and don't contain personal information that isn't needed
I don't even need a popup asking for users to give permission to store personal information, because I'm not doing anything that needs that.