[reaperducer]

Under current policy, threats to US industry are threats to national security

Certain industries. Usually industries that are critical to the functioning of the economy, or that have been concentrated in hostile or semi-hostile nations without alternatives in friendly countries.

Policy, like everything else in life, is a lot more complicated than the internet likes to portray.

[DiogenesKynikos]

The idea that reliance on Canadian steel represents a threat to US national security is not plausible. Canada isn't hostile to the US, and it would be inconceivable for Canada to cut off steel exports to the US in a critical moment. The Trump administration is quite transparently misusing the phrase "national security" to justify measures meant to force trade concessions from other countries, including American allies.

[c256]

The argument, as I understand it, is this: US national security interests are seriously harmed if the US steel industry is severely hampered.

Note that I’m not attempting to assert a truth, moral, or effectiveness value for this argument.

[DiogenesKynikos]

That argument requires one to assume that Canada might withhold shipments of steel to the United States at some critical moment. Otherwise, it doesn't matter whether steel comes from the US or Canada. As long as Canada doesn't shut down shipments, the United States' access to steel is secure, even if 100% of it comes from Canada.

The argument that Canada might cut off US access to steel is not plausible. The fact that the Trump administration is using the phrase "national security" to try to wring economic and political concessions out of Canada is transparent.