Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stordoff 2570 days ago
The ISPO has ruled against the Daily Mail / Mail Online multiple times:

https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - "The publication had failed to handle publication sensitively"

https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - "Publishing photographs of the complainants taken in such circumstances represented an intrusion; the publication had not sought to justify the publication of the images in the public interest."

https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("This gave rise to a misleading impression of the effects of GDPR legislation")

https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("This article was a report of an inquest, in which the deceased had been inaccurately identified. This was a fundamental and damaging error on a basic point of fact. [...T]he correct position was readily available, [so] there had been a failure on the part of the agency providing the story to take care over its accuracy.")

https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("The repetition of these serious allegations against the man, with no indication they had been disproven, seriously misrepresented the judgment")

amongst others.