|
|
|
|
|
by TeMPOraL
2576 days ago
|
|
> Better to fund robots at 1/10 of the level of a manned mission, and get to explore the entire solar system instead. The unfortunate reality is, once people settle for this, the 1/10 will get cut to 1/1000 because "all you do is send robots to dead rocks". Funding science isn't sexy these days. > If people are dead set on humanity having a 'backup plan', then the Moon is right next door and we can even set it up with wifi. For some x-risks Moon may be just a bit too close. I understand that the x-risk avoidance argument is a niche one, though. IMO we should absolutely do the Moon - and then Mars or Venus (or both). |
|