[archit3cture]

It is nice to see that CockroachDB's team keep their original vision of creating a long term open source "commons" of their database.

What I don't totally understand when I take my developer's hat is why the split between "enterprise" features under CCL and core features under APL/BSL is kept. Without the "enterprise" features, CRDB does not feel like beeing totally open source and open source users are sort of second-zone users.

Are open-source fans supposed to write clean-room implementations of the features (would it even make sense in the licencing model CRDB uses) ?

It would also be nice to have a licencing clause where a change of ownership of CockRoach Labs or the bailout of the company would trigger a licence change for the enterprise features (maybe even after N years).

But as I said congrats on the product and all the best in your commercial endeavour ! may this licence change open new cloud opportunities !