|
|
|
|
|
by skybrian
2569 days ago
|
|
I agree that it's very useful to prolong the amount of time spent in earlier, healthier stages of life. The treatments described in the New Yorker article sound quite promising. However, you aren't taking the elderly seriously. It's not "wildly pessimistic" to spend time thinking about what happens after people get beyond that point. This is something that happens to everyone who doesn't die first. It's a normal part of life. |
|
>It's not "wildly pessimistic" to spend time thinking about what happens after people get beyond that point.
Your thoughts are pessimistic, not the fact that you are thinking. The main purpose of a nursing home is to extend the length of people's lives. If you think this is inhumane, then perhaps you would prefer a crematorium to a nursing home?
There is nothing about extending the life of people who are in a place specifically to have their lives extended that is 'not taking the elderly seriously.'