|
|
|
|
|
by damnyou
2574 days ago
|
|
One person's incentives are another's abusive vendor lock-in. Each time you use the sign in with Apple button, it becomes ever so harder to switch away from Apple products. Each time your friends add you to an iMessage group chat (instead of, say, a WhatsApp one) it becomes ever so harder to switch away from Apple products. Each time you buy an Apple home speaker or Apple TV or whatever else it becomes harder to switch away from Apple products. Google's stuff works better if you're all in but works fine piecemeal. Apple's stuff works fine all in but doesn't work at all piecemeal. Tech folks should be up in arms about all this, but all you see on this wretched forum are rationalizations involving "business models" and "paying customers". You want to see a software maker actually care about people's privacy? See Mozilla. Oh but you can't set Firefox as your default browser on your $1200 iPhone, sorry. |
|
Since the beginning, Apple wants to justify its premium by it just works which has allowed novice users to use their Macs and then iPhones and other products. With privacy, it's another one of those "it just works" plus "you don't have to worry about it".
If Apple can tie security to its already high brand equity, it will be and continue to be in a good place in today's fear mongering world. It's always better to sell a pain killer than a vitamin and security is top of mind for consumers now more than ever. If nothing else their advertising campaigns are pushing that education onto consumers.