|
|
|
|
|
by vidarh
2570 days ago
|
|
Is there anything about this change? Because I'm certain Sweden has indicted people in absentia long before Assange, though it is rare. E.g. I'm pretty sure they indicted the person later convicted of the assassination of foreign minister Anna Lindh in absentia before he was apprehended, and that was back in 2003. I'll also note that the prosecutor was contradicted by Swedish legal experts already back when Assange was detained in the UK and Ny first made that claim. It was noteworthy also because Swedish police sent people to interview two suspected murderers elsewhere in Europe while Assange's extradiction case was happening, yet Ny continued to claim it was impossible for her to do so with Assange. I think Assange was being paranoid, but I also think Ny was letting her own preferences take precedence over pursuing the case as best possible, for whatever her reasons might be (I've in the past suggested that rather than US involvement it's more likely she "just" wanted to make an example of him, but that's pure speculation) EDIT: Here's a brief news item claiming the above assassin was indicted in absentia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-09-17/man-detained-over-kil... Here is a more substantial one: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/swedish-police-issue-arrest-... |
|